When They Becomes We...
Christena Cleveland ends her book with more hope than I was
anticipating. When discussing issues like discrimination and segregation, it is
easy to find only the pessimistic outlook and stick with it to the end: “people
are born like this, bred like this, live like this, and die like this”. It is
easy to look for the perspective that offers no hope of change and simply sits
on the sideline and condemns.
However, Cleveland refuses to do this. She takes Disunity in Christ and steadily treads
down the long-suffering road of hope. Her perseverance through this journey
leads to some resounding and markedly hopeful statements and sentiments about
what God has equipped us – as Christians and as human beings – to do.
Throughout the chapter, she repeats a phrase that stuck with
me: “when they becomes we, ___”. The word ‘we’ is not homogenous. It is not “colorblind”,
as she cautions against near the end of this chapter. ‘We’ simply implies something
stronger than the conflicts we attempt to create between “us” and “them”. We creates a barrier to pride and
self-serving biases because there is no one left to lord-over and demand homage
from. We forms a strong, unified
front against discrimination and segregation and bias and all of the tools of
sin and temptation.
We is stronger
than us.
She uses that phrase in five ways: “When they become we, we
naturally like them a whole lot more… when they become we, we’re more open to
receiving helpful criticism from them… when they become we, we forgive them
more easily and are less likely to expect them to experience collective guilt…
when they become we, our diversity initiatives will finally begin to work… when
they become we, we treat each other better.”
Each of these phrases brought a little stirring of hope in
my chest as I read them.
Yes, I thought, we CAN do better.
These five expressions of unity demand action. While they may
simply appear to promise a bright future, there is also an implicit demand for
sharp, immediate action. These things cannot
come to pass if we sit idly. If there is no end to our use of “they”, there can
be no beginning to our use of “we”.
That change does not have to start at a macro level. In
fact, I don’t think it should. Rather, I think these changes have to begin at
the micro level. It begins at the individual, the family, the small group, the
youth group, the church. Change begins at the root and spreads up the branches.
It begins at the cell and spreads throughout the body.
God created humanity with a remarkable skill: the ability to
change. That is amazing and marvelous. Of course, we cannot change on our own.
We must first reach out to Him, so that He can empower us to reach out to
others.
Great reflections here--I think you're right about where the change needs to start. I was just reading an article about how the elections have created such division and how as Christians we seek unity intentionally in a lot of areas but in politics we are just plain mean to each other. And you're right--when we include each other as part of ourselves, we naturally demonstrate much more grace.
ReplyDeleteI love so much that you decided to bring out the hope that Cleveland herself sees. And you're right, I find it almost too easy to get trapped into a world of seeing racial issues as pessimistic, especially coming from our side. And sometimes I personally feel like I'm getting trapped if I try to include myself in the world of others by saying "we." "We" can do this. "We" can make a change. Sometimes it is hard to see that kind of action have to fall on anyone else except the transgressors that are us, yet it is "we." It is all of us, in micro relationships, that slowly change the outcome of another, giving us hope to go forward into new relationships.
ReplyDelete